Nark said:
It all relies on internal analysis
I agree. There is no external evidence to support the JEDP theory. There is archeological evidence to support the Moses account. To say that we would not expect external evidence for JEDP and “look there isn’t any therefore it must be true” is to argue from silence. Here is a list of articles discussing archeology and the Bible.
-- differences of language, syntax, style,
This is not a problem for Moses. While Moses was responsible for most of the content, he is not solely responsible. Certainly it does not require that the Pentateuch was in its final form much later than Moses.
narrative gaps,
Every historical account has narrative gaps.
repetitions, doublets, anachronisms, contradictions, redactional seams and so on.
These are making problems where none exist:
Ø “If Abraham claimed that Sarah was his sister twice, then the same story must have been added in a second time because surely Abraham wouldn’t have committed the same mistake twice.” This reasoning is nonsense.
o It assumes that people always learn their lesson from a mistake or that they could not possibly repeat an action.
o If I remember correctly, sometimes the same story will appear in two different books of the OT. There is nothing significant about an author repeating an account in another work.
Ø DH theorists try to claim that if a more modern name for something is used for a place, then it could not have been written when it was said to be written.
o First, I generally agree with the premise.
o If a document in English is supposed to be from the year 1600 and it states that “Marco Polo went to China”, we know that it wasn’t written in 1750 because “Cathay” was used at that time by English speaking people.
o However, it is misapplied to Moses.
o Moses did not write in Hebrew or Aramaic. The anachronisms would appear because of the translation into Hebrew.
o If a document was written in 1600 in Swahili referring to China – using the Swahili word for China – was then translated into English in 1970; there is no problem in them term “China” appearing in the translation of 1970.
Ø The contradictions can be reconciled, usually quite easily.
o People who point to lists such as 1001 Contradictions of the Bible as if they have proved something are intellectually lazy and ignorant.
o Most such “contradictions” can be easily explained by getting a little better grasp of the passages in question.
o I am amazed by people that try to claim, “The Bible teaches that pi equals 3, everyone knows that it is 3.14, therefore the Bible has an error in it!”
§ No where in the entire Bible does it say pi equals anything.
§ A vessel that is 10 units across the top and 30 units around the outside can be easily made.
§ A vessel can be made using virtually any ratio of measurements depending on the contour.
Ø Some links on the matter:
o Article on anachronistic names
o http://www.christian-thinktank.com/hway.html
o http://www.tektonics.org/othub.html